The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society BBS
  Comment on This Bulletin Board
  Palin thread

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Palin thread
tony g
Member
posted 09-12-2008 06:22 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for tony g     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
posted 09-12-2008 06:19 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What I'd like to know was my Palin thread closed because L22 asked Admin5 to close it or because Admin5 had had enough of his innane ramblings. Either way I would like to know. If it was for the first reason then he had no right to ask for deletion as he was the main cause of the arguments and upsets himself. To go crying to Admin5 that he was being attacked is very hypocritical after all the mud slinging he has done himself. I did see his phone number so I suspect that may be the case. If it was the second reason then Admin5 I am annoyed at you for not weeding out his individual posts along with other posts you may have found offensive. Amongst all the diatribe and invective there were pertinent points of view about M's Palin and the presidential race that some of us genuinely wanted to know more about......Tony

IP: Logged

boletus_hunter
Member
posted 09-13-2008 12:24 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for boletus_hunter   Click Here to Email boletus_hunter     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by tony g:
posted 09-12-2008 06:19 PM

IP: Logged

pj
Member
posted 09-13-2008 07:02 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for pj   Click Here to Email pj     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Another reason to have a moderator, someone who can yank weeds as they crop up instead of yanking the entire thread.

IP: Logged

Tex
Member
posted 09-13-2008 12:59 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Tex   Click Here to Email Tex     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I'm really disappointed. The admins have kicked people off for less than what this guy/gal has been doing. I see he's still around.

This individual needs to be banned. Can you just ban someone from a particular forum? He might actually want to talk about his disease or help someone with theirs someday. I'd hate to see him lose that.

But he has no business on the Open Forum. And, yes, I informed him of a discussion we were having he might want to participate in. He was Bible Bombing people on the transplantation forum and he needed a distraction.

Still, even with the Meltdown, I don't think I've ever pulled a thread. I took down that thread, which had a lot of good thought on it, because he had become intolerable.

IP: Logged

cgrobin
Member
posted 09-13-2008 03:16 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for cgrobin     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I don't think under the current management of the board, anyone is paying close attention to who started what, and who's instigating trouble on the board.

I don't know if it's done here, but many boards will give the poster a warning first, then if they continue their behavior they are at risk of being banned.

Under the current arrangement, I think if you want to the admins to address a particular poster, you need to present your case to them, including pointing to incidents so they don't have to hunt them down.

Personally, I think Lorenzo22 lost any claim to 'innocence' when he implied Deb, who will believe is banned from his site, was a party to his attack and that he spoke for her.

I read a lot of sites, but that doesn't give me the right to speak for them or drag them into my battles.

IP: Logged

tony g
Member
posted 09-13-2008 06:49 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for tony g     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Personally I was quite happy to let L22 carry on and show what a dimbo he is. Where I objected was his blatant trouble making and downright nauseiating attacks on other people. It is not as if we could not have handled him. So why delete the thread? What was said to so upset the Admins' sensibilities?......Tony

IP: Logged

cgrobin
Member
posted 09-13-2008 09:19 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for cgrobin     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
It could have been his posts upsetting the community, or the communities reply back.

It's just hard to get a thread back on topic when he just won't stop and needs to have the last word.

IP: Logged

Arizona Girl
Member
posted 09-13-2008 10:42 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Arizona Girl     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
If the Admins. were that upset by it, they could have just posted a comment to stay on task.

It's my belief that they are probably not sitting around reading every thread and that they must have been alerted to this particular thread by "someone".

It was a great thread, Tony. Nice to divert the talk from cancer from time to time.

Kris

IP: Logged

tony g
Member
posted 09-14-2008 12:17 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for tony g     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
As I have said over on another Palin thread when one of the posters put an objection to the forum becoming too political. It is an Open forum. To constantly talk about cancer does no one any good at all. A bit of mental diversion is good therapy. Well it is for me anyhow.LOL. I'm sure if it was a Nascar thread or a sports thread no one would bother much and they would soon drop off the list. Funny thing is the guy who complained about it not being cancer related is now so hooked up in it he has become a major poster on economics.LOL. Go figure ......Tony

IP: Logged

MichaelM
Member
posted 09-15-2008 02:35 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for MichaelM   Click Here to Email MichaelM     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
As I have said over on another Palin thread when one of the posters put an objection to the forum becoming too political. It is an Open forum. To constantly talk about cancer does no one any good at all. A bit of mental diversion is good therapy.

I would be "that guy," Tony. I've been around for several years and have nearly 800 posts to my name, though most are not in the open forum.

Simply saying I "complained" is disingenuous, as is the implication that I said anything that could be remotely construed as asserting that we should talk only about cancer. I said, I believe at least twice in the threads in question, that I fully supported the open forum being an open forum. And I went out of my way to give a rather lengthy explanation of why I was uncomfortable with threads that are simply blatantly partisan "Look at how bad THOSE people in the other party are" posts when half the people on this board are THOSE people.

That is not saying "talk only about cancer." That is not saying "don't talk about this stuff." I have several times in the past - including in threads that 'got political' - disagreed openly with people who have said specifically that the forum was not the place for this or that kind of discussion.

What I said - again - is that THIS particular type of political rhetoric, and the sudden appearance of numerous threads in that vein, seemed out of place given what it engenders. There is political discussion, and then there is partisan sniping. There are plenty of other very large, popular forums for that kind of discussion, all of which are little more than non-stop flamewars, and I'm not sure that's what most people here want to see.

And, strangely enough, when I did talk politics in those very threads I was told I should take my input elsewhere to another thread. Apparently the rules of acceptable discourse are situational, but only situationally.

So, forgive me for voicing my opinion, and I'm sorry you disagree with it, but don't be dishonest about what I've said. It's that sort of reply of thing - along with what can I can only construe as a rather snarky insult to my character and intellect by someone who compared me to a politician for whom they clearly harbor an extreme lack of respect and a similar degree of disgust - that prompted me to leave the threads in which I participated. You'll note, by the way, that I pointed out my own participation in the thread despite my better judgement, and you'll also note that my participation was not in the form of partisan attacks. I was truly interested in objectively discussing issues, countering myths and memes, and trying to approach actual issues without filtering them through highly distorting political rhetoric. Unfortunately, no one else seems very interested in that, and it doesn't really matter because (as your comment demonstrates) in these types of discussions it doesn't matter what you say or how far backward you bend over to explain your thoughts - you're either 'with us' or 'against us.' It doesn't matter what you say, someone is always going to hear what they want.


quote:
Funny thing is the guy who complained about it not being cancer related is now so hooked up in it he has become a major poster on economics

Do me a favor, Tony. Since you've characterized my input so accurately, why don't you dig up the post from me where I "complained about it not being cancer related."

Can you do that for me? Can you find the post where I say what you keep claiming I said? I'm sure it's there.

[This message has been edited by MichaelM (edited 09-15-2008).]

IP: Logged

Tex
Member
posted 09-15-2008 04:32 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Tex   Click Here to Email Tex     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Michael,

I'm pretty sure tony was speaking of L22 or someone else. You didn't complain about it being too political, at least nothing I read of yours said that.

When the topics on the Open Forum turn to religion or politics, there is (almost) always someone who complains we shouldn't be discussing these topics on a cancer BB. I'm assuming that if it wasn't L22, it was someone similar.

All I saw from you was a criticism of the off-issue issues.

IP: Logged

tony g
Member
posted 09-15-2008 05:28 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for tony g     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Nice try Michael I went back to check for the relevant sentence. Oh dear, it was not there. A deft piece of editing removed it. pity you can't remove Robin's telling you to start another thread and see if it drops down the list. Or Angels agreeing with me "Bravo Tony you read my mind" lol.....Tony

IP: Logged

tony g
Member
posted 09-15-2008 05:55 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for tony g     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Michael as far as I am concerned you can talk about what you like. You are a prolific poster and no doubt could get the better of me in most arguments. Just do not try to make out I am complaining about something you said then delete it, to try to make out I have some memory issues or misinterpreted what you said. As best as I can recall you said why are we talking politics when this is a cancer forum....Tony

[This message has been edited by tony g (edited 09-15-2008).]

IP: Logged

MichaelM
Member
posted 09-15-2008 06:25 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for MichaelM   Click Here to Email MichaelM     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Tony claimed the guy who made the "only talk about cancer" complaint was now talking about economics, which would be me. I've honestly not paid a lot of attention to L22, I tend to tune singular posters out when they're off the rails unless they're attacking the general community or advocating poor medical advise.

I see Tony has posted several responses, but I've not read any of them. I'll be back later tonight, and if I cool down enough I'll see what he has to say. I'm more of the mind to just drop open forum again entirely, as I keep promising myself I will.

IP: Logged

cgrobin
Member
posted 09-15-2008 06:30 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for cgrobin     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Actually it wasn't any off topic he complained about, but discussing politics 'here'.

quote:
But then, couldn't I just post those without offering any comment? Shouldn't I just keep my mouth quiet and let the black-and-white 'discourse' continue uninterrupted, lest I be treated as L22 v2? What is actually the point of interjecting anything into this thread, beyond my objection to stocking the open forum of a cancer board with openly partisan discussions that will do specifically nothing but drive a wedge between members (last I checked, both liberals and conservatives get cancers) for little apparent value. We're all viewing what the rest of us can view, reading what the rest of us can find on the internet to read (I find it odd for anyone to say they would come to a thread like this to "learn more about" Palin given the availability of the internet and the clear ideology of this thread; not exactly the first sort of place I would look for objective information), and no one is going to change anyone's opinion, meaning this - to me - is little more than people sitting around on the open forum of a cancer board proselytizing to each other.

Doesn't matter if you're liberal or conservative or libertarian or socialist, I just find it a little odd to be doing this _here_. I'm not saying don't, I'm not saying I've got the self-control not to chime in against my better judgement and contribute to that which I'm arguing against, I'm not saying politics-related issues are bad, I'm saying this particular sort of thing I find out of place.


As for telling Michael to start another thread, I was attempting keep a thread on topic. We were discussing Palin and he out of the blue posted about Biden. I suggested if he wanted to discuss Biden to start a thread on him. It's like having a discussion on the side effects of CHOP and someone suddenly posts a rant about BEAM.

IP: Logged

tony g
Member
posted 09-15-2008 07:36 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for tony g     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Thanks for finding the thread. I appologise to Michael for thinking he had deleted them. I still do not understand what point he was trying to make. Was he objecting to it being solely about Palin or objecting to the discussion being on a cancer forum?.....Tony

[This message has been edited by tony g (edited 09-15-2008).]

IP: Logged

All times are ET (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society | Privacy Statement


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47e